I normally stay away from these topics due to their heavy handed political ramifications. Opinions of technological social impact will either be overwhelmed by mass social acceptance or manifested due to mass social rejection of technologies in the end game. Where mass social acceptance occurs, such negative opinions of technological change do serve a purpose of limiting economically driven abuse by overzealous adopters of the technology in question.
A quote by George Soros comes to mind based on the continuous mis-statements of both sides of this privacy issue:
"The open society is based on the recognition that we act on the basis of imperfect understanding and our actions have unintended consequences"
That is highly relevant here. Chris is correct in that the effort to obtain RFID data in its current state is hardly worth the effort since there are so many easier methods of stealing private information. Furthermore, RFID based data is essentially worthless until it is tied to access to normally secured databases of private companies given permission by users to store that information.
In the end, the market will give permission for how that RFID data is stored, accessed and used on tags or there won't be a market for RFID related to direct consumer interaction. The adopters of RFID will respond as such or go out of business. Those of us who advocate privacy can only educate the consumer on the risks of how RFID is being used, what personal data is accessible via realistic means by those with criminal intent and how this could impact them in the future as technology changes. The consumer must decide if this defined risk is OK or not.
By creating misunderstandings in extremist arguments, privacy advocates lose credibility in the end utlimately resulting in those "unintended consequences". Even as an RFID professional, I am very much against certain RFID activities going on now but supportive of the greater good that is also running in parallel activities in this field. The arguments I have seen coming out of the privacy advocates relative to this field are all talking in circles and very much out of ignorance of the real capabilities of RFID. A lot of this talk is in futures and is terribly misleading to the uninitiated. This leads to equally inaccurate responses from the opposition only creating confusion and thus a complacent mindset about the whole issue.
There are privacy holes in every technological innovation as well as mainstream technologies - hence the rapid rise in ID theft this past decade. Focus the privacy effort on database access which includes tag content. It is ultimately database access, access authentication and irresponsible managment of that data that remains the real issue here. If you are personally worried about being tracked in some way, then throw away your cell phone, don't use credit cards, don't carry RFID devices and don't drive your vehicle in cities with video license plate ID, never write a check and burn all your trash. These are choices you have. Choices that are counter to the social norm, but choices nonetheless.
I am an independent RFID consultant with nearly 20 years experience, 3 patents and 9 patents pending in the field including core technology as well as business process. I can be reached at wsteeves@neurotag.com.
Wayne Steeves
Enterprise Development Group